Actions389
- Contract Actions
- Ticket History Actions
- Ticket Note Webhook Actions
- Ticket Note Actions
- Ticket Webhook Actions
- Time Entry Actions
- Resource Actions
- Role Actions
- Resource Role Actions
- Search Filter Actions
- Service Actions
- Skill Actions
- Service Call Actions
- Survey Results Actions
- Survey Actions
- Ticket Actions
- Opportunity Actions
- Notification History Actions
- Invoice Actions
- Product Actions
- Product Vendor Actions
- Project Actions
- Project Charge Actions
- Project Phase Actions
- Project Task Actions
- Project Note Actions
- Contract Retainer Actions
- Contract Service Actions
- Contract Service Adjustment Actions
- Contract Service Bundle Actions
- Contract Service Bundle Unit Actions
- Contract Service Bundle Adjustment Actions
- Contract Ticket Purchase Actions
- Contract Service Unit Actions
- Domain Registrar Actions
- Holiday Actions
- Holiday Set Actions
- Contract Exclusion Billing Code Actions
- Contract Rate Actions
- Contract Exclusion Role Actions
- Contract Exclusion Sets Actions
- Contract Exclusion Set Excluded Role Actions
- Contract Exclusion Set Excluded Work Type Actions
- Contract Milestone Actions
- Contract Note Actions
- Contract Role Costs Actions
- Contact Groups Actions
- Contact Actions
- Contact Webhook Actions
- Contact Group Contacts Actions
- Contract Block Hour Factor Actions
- Contract Block Actions
- Contract Billing Rule Actions
- Contract Charge Actions
- Configuration Item Category Actions
- Configuration Item Category UDF Association Actions
- Configuration Item DNS Record Actions
- Configuration Item Note Actions
- Configuration Item Related Item Actions
- Configuration Item SSL Subject Alternative Name Actions
- Configuration Item Type Actions
- Configuration Item Webhook Actions
- Company Alert Actions
- Company Actions
- Billing Code Actions
- Company Location Actions
- Company Note Actions
- Company Webhook Actions
- Configuration Item Actions
- Configuration Item Billing Product Association Actions
Overview
This node interacts with the Autotask REST API to retrieve detailed information about a specific Contract Billing Rule by its ID. It is useful for automating workflows that require fetching billing rule data related to contracts, such as billing automation, contract management, or financial reporting. For example, a user can retrieve a contract billing rule's details to validate billing conditions or integrate billing data into other systems.
Properties
| Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Billing Rule ID | The unique identifier of the contract billing rule to retrieve. |
| Add Picklist Labels | Determines whether to add human-readable label fields (with suffix '_label') for picklist fields in the response, enhancing readability. |
| Add Reference Labels | Determines whether to add human-readable label fields (with suffix '_label') for reference fields in the response. |
| Select Columns Names or IDs. | Specifies which fields to include in the response. If none are selected, all fields are returned. The ID field is always included. |
| Flatten User-Defined Fields | Determines whether user-defined fields (UDFs) are promoted to top-level properties in the output instead of being nested. |
Output
JSON
id- The unique identifier of the contract billing rule.name- The name of the contract billing rule.description- Description or details about the contract billing rule.userDefinedFields- Array of user-defined fields related to the billing rule, unless flattened.
_label - Human-readable label for picklist or reference fields if enabled.
Dependencies
- Requires an API key credential for authenticating with the Autotask REST API.
Troubleshooting
- If the Billing Rule ID is invalid or not found, the node will throw an error indicating the resource could not be retrieved. Verify the ID is correct.
- If API authentication fails, ensure the API key credential is correctly configured and has sufficient permissions.
- Selecting specific columns that do not exist may result in incomplete data or errors; verify field names or IDs are valid.
- Enabling flattening of user-defined fields may cause naming conflicts if UDF names overlap with standard fields.